Sherlock holmes 111/21/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() It's not the most cerebral mystery Holmes has ever been asked to tackle, but it makes up for that with high-tension excitement. Rachel McAdams brings new depth to the often-overlooked adversary Irene Adler, a fascinating self-centered third side to the conflict. ![]() Mark Strong delivers an enjoyably creepy performance in the leading villain role, riding the line between Victorian-era criminal and Scooby-Doo antagonist. Holmes and Watson are forced to delve into the world of occultism to solve a string of murders that appear to be committed by a recently executed criminal. This film introduces some unusual elements to a classic mystery story, but largely benefits from it. Whether they're fighting through a brutal action setpiece or casually exchanging banter in a quiet study, Law and Downey are one of the better Holmes and Watson duos yet committed to screen.īut a Sherlock Holmes film is only as good as the mystery that the title character is set against. Downey and Law's chemistry in their roles is the most highly-praised aspect of the film, and they deserve all the positive press they get. Law was on an excellent run at this point in his career, and while Watson wasn't his most prestigious role, it was one of his best of the era. Alongside Downey's Holmes was Jude Law in the role of John Watson, which he also took to with substantial success. He's stellar as Sherlock, and he received a Golden Globe for the role. This was the very first role he accepted after his complete reversal of fortune in Iron Man, and it served him well. portrays the beloved detective with exactly the kind of easy charisma and sardonic wit one would expect from him. He succeeded, partially because the star behind one of the world's favorite superheroes took the lead role. Ritchie wanted to add the action he loved to the character's intellect and interweave the two, turning his beloved Sherlock into the action hero he saw in his head. Hollywood is often loath to portray a character as both a capable fighter and an intelligent mind. The visual of Holmes as an armchair detective was often overstated in the earlier on-screen adaptation. He saw many of the old adaptations as inaccurate due to their lack of large-scale action scenes, and sought to rectify the matter. Luckily, Ritchie was a fan of the old books. The classic serials of the 30s and 40s were still the defining cultural image of the detective. Barring a few TV movies, Holmes had been on hiatus from the screen for a strangely long time. In 2009, late of his middling return to form RocknRolla, Ritchie took over Warner Bros.'s new take on Sherlock Holmes, to the shock of many.Īt the time of Guy Ritchie's adaptation, the most recent theatrical Sherlock Holmes film had been released 20 years earlier. Ritchie understands something about the ethos of the criminal underbelly of London that clicks with his audience, and he's certainly made some decent films in the process. Though almost every other film he has ever made received, at best, mixed reception, his fans are numerous and extremely devoted. Ritchie followed it up with 2000s Snatch, solidifying his niche in the gritty crime comedy world. On top of prompting its star's later ascension to fame, the film is a solid and well-loved black comedy with a hard action edge. The film introduced the world to Jason Statham, a phenomenon that has yet to die down even today. Guy Ritchie exploded into the world of gangster cinema in 1998 with his feature debut Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. RELATED: Holmes & Watson Squandered A Great Premise If one were to list every modern director, though, Guy Ritchie would have been one of the last choices to handle the property. Safe in the public domain, Holmes has appeared all over TV and film in a thousand different iterations by a thousand different creators. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories are among the most heavily adapted works in all of literary canon. Guy Ritchie is more so the latter than the former, but he's shocked the world before. Others do one specific thing so well that they become beloved by fans of that subgenre and rarely deviate from their niche. Some directors have a filmography that reads like the greatest hits record, featuring nothing but culture-defining blockbusters one after another. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |